How to use this: Tiers reflect engineering culture, growth potential, and comp — not just brand prestige. A B+ company where you own a real product beats an A+ company where you resolve tickets for 3 years. Context matters.
God Tier / SSS
Elite quant trading and deep-tech product companies. Extremely selective — top 1% CS only.
Comp
$150k – $250k+ AUD (grad)
Culture
Small teams, research-heavy, performance-driven
Growth
Fastest track to principal / researcher roles
Who thrives
Competitive programming backgrounds, top-ranked grads
S+ / S — Premium Product
AU-native unicorns and high-growth global scaleups with genuine engineering culture.
Culture
Strong eng culture, internal mobility, good L&D
Growth
Clear IC ladder; meaningful product ownership from year 1
Who thrives
Strong fundamentals grads who want to build real product
A+ — FAANG-adjacent
Globally recognised brands with strong AU engineering presence and RSU packages.
Culture
Structured, process-heavy at scale; excellent brand on resume
Growth
Excellent — huge scope to move teams internally
Who thrives
Grads who want FAANG brand + solid distributed systems exposure
B — Traditional Enterprise
Large companies where IT is a cost centre. Good for stability and visa sponsorship.
Culture
Slower pace, legacy codebases, political promotions
Growth
Slow — tenure + certifications drive advancement
Who thrives
Grads prioritising stability or 482 visa sponsorship
Avoid
Watch for these warning signs regardless of company name.
- No public engineering blog or tech content
- No L&D budget or training support
- "Unlimited PTO" with no one taking it
- Majority contractor / outsourced workforce
- Salary quoted inclusive of super without disclosure
Comp
Often below market, verify carefully
Culture
"Work hard play hard" on Glassdoor; no code review culture
Growth
Minimal — high burnout, high turnover
Who thrives
Nobody — move on quickly if you land here